Abdalla Soudan , A. Blanc France , F. Holthoer Finlande , S. Gordon-jaquet USA , W. Kaisser RFA , J. Leclant France , G. Obenga Congo , S. Sauneron France , T. Parmi les observateurs, on notait les professeurs V.
Why should you use Wordery Specialist
Grottanelli Italie , S. Glele et Mme Melcer. They tend to follow monogamy. Like many of the Serer group, the Noons rarely marry out. Where a young Serer-Noon has left his or her village for more than three months, on their return, they were subjected to prove their sexual purity. The head griot would offer them a beverage that they must drink. If vomit after drinking it, they were found guilty and sentence to celibacy. This test was just one of many tests carried out by the head griot.
The head male griot would test the young man whilst the head female griot would test the young woman. They speak the Noon language , which is one of the Cangin languages rather than a dialect of the Serer-Sine language.
Shop with confidence
Their language is closely related to Saafi and the Laalaa language. Like many of the Serer group to which they belong, the Noon were very resistant to Islamization, and still adhere to the tenets of Serer religion. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Serer kings of Sine left - right: Timeline of Serer history , Serer ancient history , and Serer history medieval era to present. Diop supported his arguments with references to ancient authors such as Herodotus and Strabo. For example, when Herodotus wished to argue that the Colchian people were related to the Egyptians, he said that the Colchians were "black, with curly hair"  Diop used statements by these writers to illustrate his theory that the ancient Egyptians had the same physical traits as modern black Africans skin colour, hair type.
His interpretation of anthropological data such as the role of matriarchy and archeological data led him to conclude that Egyptian culture was a Black African culture. In linguistics, he believed in particular that the Wolof language of contemporary West Africa is related to ancient Egyptian. Diop's early condemnation of European bias in his work Nations Negres et Culture,  and in Evolution of the Negro World  has been supported by some later scholarship.
Diop's view that the scholarship of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century was based on a racist view of Africans was regarded as controversial when he wrote in the s through to the early s, the field of African scholarship still being influenced by Carleton S. Coon used racial rankings of inferiority and superiority, defined "true Blacks" as only those of cultures south of the Sahara, and grouped some Africans with advanced cultures with Caucasian clusters.
Similarly, the Dynastic Race Theory of Egypt asserted that a mass migration of Caucasoid peoples was needed to create the Egyptian kingships, as slower-witted Negro tribes were incapable. Genetic studies have disproved these notions. It found that some European researchers had earlier tried to make Africans seem a special case, somehow different from the rest of the world's population flow and mix. This seemed to apply in matters both of evolution and gene pool makeup.
The reviewers found that some researchers seemed to have shifted their categories and methods to maintain this "special case" outlook. Diop consistently held that Africans could not be pigeonholed into a rigid type that existed somewhere south of the Sahara, but they varied widely in skin color, facial shape, hair type, height, and a number of additional factors, just like other human populations. He said that their cultural, genetic and material links could not be defined away or separated into a regrouped set of racial clusters.
At the same time, the statistical net is cast much more narrowly in the case of 'blacks', carefully defining them as an extreme type south of the Sahara and excluding related populations like Somalians, Nubians and Ethiopians,  as well as the ancient Badarians, a key indigenous group. It is held by Keita et al. For example, ancient Egyptian matches with Indians and Europeans are generic in nature due to the broad categories used for matching purposes with these populations and are not due to gene flow. Ancient Egyptians such as the Badarians show greater statistical affinities to tropical African types and are not identical to Europeans.
Keita of Badarian crania in predynastic upper Egypt found that the predynastic Badarian series clusters much closer with the tropical African series than European samples. Diop's theory on variability is also supported by a number of scholars mapping human genes using modern DNA analysis. Arbitrarily classifying Maasai, Ethiopians, Shillouk, Nubians, etc. They hold that such splitting is arbitrary insertion of data into pre-determined pigeonholes and the selective grouping of samples. Diop's arguments to place Egypt in the cultural and genetic context of Africa met a wide range of condemnation and rejection.
He did not publish his work in subject-specific journals with an independent editorial board that practiced the system of peer review. He declined to seek the opinion of other scholars and answer their criticism, although this is the normal procedure in academic debate. His research has become under-regarded because he did not accept this academic discipline.
- Mate Marks 2: Thirst!
- Les chemins du Nil. Les relations entre l'Égypte ancienne et l'Afrique Noire | Africultures.
- Anthropologie et migrations africaines en France : une généalogie des recherches;
- Les chemins du Nil. Les relations entre l’Égypte ancienne et l’Afrique Noire;
Scholars such as Bruce Trigger condemned the often shaky scholarship on such northeast African peoples as the Egyptians. He declared that the peoples of the region were all Africans, and decried the "bizarre and dangerous myths" of previously biased scholarship, "marred by a confusion of race, language, and culture and by an accompanying racism.
He did not believe that such a population needed to be arbitrarily split into tribal or racial clusters. A book chapter by archeologist Kevin MacDonald, published in , argued that there is little basis for positing a close connection between Dynastic Egypt and the African interior. Nevertheless, he awarded Diop and similar scholars credit for posing these problems. One of Diop's most controversial issues centers on the definition of who is a true Black person.
- Shaking Hands with the Devil: The Intersection of Terrorism and Theology?
- Clarinet Concerto No. 2 in E-flat Major, Op. 74.
- The Portrait of a Lady (Annotated - Includes Essay and Biography).
Diop insisted on a broad interpretation similar to that used in classifying European populations as white. He alleged his critics were using the narrowest possible definition of "Blacks" in order to differentiate various African groups such as Nubians into a European or Caucasoid racial zone. Under the "true negro" approach, Diop contended that those peoples who did not meet the stereotypical classification were attributed to mixture with outside peoples, or were split off and assigned to Caucasoid clusters.
He also stated that opponents were hypocritical in stating that the race of Egyptians was not important to define, but they did not hesitate to introduce race under new guises.
For instance, Diop suggested that the uses of terminology like "Mediterranean" or "Middle Eastern", or statistically classifying all who did not meet the "true" Black stereotype as some other race, were all attempts to use race to differentiate among African peoples. Diop's presentation of his concepts at the Cairo UNESCO symposium on "The peopling of ancient Egypt and the deciphering of the Meroitic script", in , argued that there were inconsistencies and contradictions in the way African data was handled.
This argument remains a hallmark of Diop's contribution. As one scholar at the symposium put it: A majority of academics disavow the term black for the Egyptians, but there is no consensus on substitute terminology.
Diop's concept was of a fundamentally Black population that incorporated new elements over time, rather than mixed-race populations crossing arbitrarily assigned racial zones. Many academics reject the term black , however, or use it exclusively in the sense of a sub-Saharan type. One approach that has bridged the gap between Diop and his critics is the non-racial bio-evolutionary approach.
This approach is associated with scholars who question the validity of race as a biological concept. They consider the Egyptians as a simply another Nile valley population or b part of a continuum of population gradation or variation among humans that is based on indigenous development, rather than using racial clusters or the concept of admixtures.
This way of viewing the data rejected Diop's insistence on Blackness, but at the same time it acknowledged the inconsistency with which data on African peoples were manipulated and categorized. Before Diop, the general view, following Charles Seligman  on the influence of Egypt on Black Africa was that elements of Egyptian religious thought, customs and technology diffused along four trade routes: Seligman's views on direct diffusion from Egypt are not generally supported to-day,  but were current when Diop started to write and may explain his wish to show that Egyptian and Black Africa culture had a common source, rather than that Egyptian influence was one way.
Diop never asserted, as some claim, that all of Africa follows an Egyptian cultural model. Instead he claims Egypt as an influential part of a "southern cradle" of civilization, an indigenous development based on the Nile Valley. While Diop holds that the Greeks learned from a superior Egyptian civilization, he does not argue that Greek culture is simply a derivative of Egypt. Instead he views the Greeks as forming part of a "northern cradle", distinctively growing out of certain climatic and cultural conditions.
Diop focuses on Africa, not Greece. Diop attempted to demonstrate that the African peoples shared certain commonalities, including language roots and other cultural elements like regicide, circumcision, totems, etc.
Serer-Noon - Wikipedia
These, he held, formed part of a tapestry that laid the basis for African cultural unity, which could assist in throwing off colonialism. His cultural theory attempted to show that Egypt was part of the African environment as opposed to incorporating it into Mediterranean or Middle Eastern venues. These concepts are laid out in Diop's Towards the African Renaissance: The Domains of Patriarchy and of Matriarchy in Classical Antiquity, ,   These concepts can be summarized as follows:. Most anthropologists see commonalities in African culture but only in a very broad, generic sense, intimately linked with economic systems, etc.
There are common patterns such as circumcision, matriarchy etc. Extremely warlike peoples, for example, the Zulu, appear frequently in the "Southern Cradle". Many cultures the world over show similar developments and a mixture of traits. Analyses of other scholars Hiernaux , Keita, et al. These connections appear not only in linguistics, see Languages demonstrating section below but in cultural areas such as religion. As regards Egyptian religion for example, there appear to be more solid connections with the cultures of the Sudan and northeast Africa than Mesopotamia, according to mainstream research: Diop considered that it was politically important to demonstrate the cultural and linguistic unity of Africa, and to base this unity on the Egyptian past.
Seligman's Hamitic hypothesis stated that: The incoming Hamites were pastoral 'Europeans'-arriving wave after wave — better armed as well as quicker witted than the dark agricultural Negroes. The and editions of Seligman's "Races of Africa" retained this statement, and many anthropologists accepted the Hamitic hypothesis into the s. However, from the s archaeologists and historians re-discovered such past African achievements as Great Zimbabwe , and from the s linguists started to demonstrate the flaws in the hypothesis.
Diop took an innovative approach in his linguistic researches published in , outlining his hypothesis of the unity of indigenous African languages beginning with the Ancient Egyptian language. He claimed this put African historical linguistics on a secure basis for the first time. The same method was applied by four of Diop's collaborators to Mbosi ,  Duala ,  Basa ,  Fula   and a few other languages. Ngom added that the Bantu languages have more in common with Ancient Egyptian than do the Semitic ones.
Shop by category
The linguistic research of Diop and his school have been criticised by Henry Tourneax, a linguist specialising in the Fula language. Diop's own Wolof studies were examined by Russell Schuh, a specialist in the Chadic languages, who found little resemblance or connection between many of the Wolof etymologies cited by Diop and Egyptian, of the type that are found when comparing Wolof to a known related language like Fula. Finally, Schur argued that, if the human species originated in Africa and it created human language, then all human languages have an African origin and are therefore related.
Modern linguistic analysis places the origin of the Afro-Asiatic languages in northeast Africa, and plausibly puts the origin of the Egyptian language in the Nile valley, between the apex of the Delta and the First of the Cataracts of the Nile. While acknowledging the common genetic inheritance of all humankind and common evolutionary threads, Diop identified a black phenotype , stretching from India, to Australia to Africa, with physical similarities in terms of dark skin and a number of other characteristics.
If we speak only of genotype, I can find a black who, at the level of his chromosomes, is closer to a Swede than Peter Botha is. But what counts in reality is the phenotype.