Eric Chaisson orients his view of the epic around an "arrow of time",  which he divides into 'Seven Ages of the Cosmos': As a physicist, he is perhaps best known for attempting to quantify the epic of evolution, using the currently known laws of science and the scientific method with its insistence on experimental tests of all ideas, principally those of energy rate density in order to empirically discriminate between objective sense and subjective nonsense. What emerges is a grand and inspiring scientific narrative of who we are and whence we came—the most recent and up-to-date version of this work having been summarized in a long peer-review article.
Bron Taylor 's Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature gives four primary categories: The creation-evolution controversy goes beyond the field of evolutionary biology and includes many fields of science cosmology, geology, paleontology, thermodynamics, physics and sociobiology.
Although in the scientific community there is essentially universal agreement that the evidence of evolution is overwhelming, and the consensus supporting the neo-Darwinian evolutionary synthesis is nearly absolute,   creationists have asserted that there is a significant scientific controversy and disagreement over the validity of the evolution epic. The debate is sometimes portrayed as being between science and religion.
However, as the National Academy of Sciences states:. Many have issued statements observing that evolution and the tenets of their faiths are compatible.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Scientists and theologians have written eloquently about their awe and wonder at the history of the universe and of life on this planet, explaining that they see no conflict between their faith in God and the evidence for evolution. Religious denominations that do not accept the occurrence of evolution tend to be those that believe in strictly literal interpretations of religious texts.
He says contemporary theology is being changed by evolutionary science. There are many versions undergoing constant revision. He considers evolution to be, at least provisionally, a most appropriate and fruitful scientific framework within which to think about God today and deplores that contemporary theology gets hung up in the creationism controversy. The profoundly sacred elements of the story warm up the cold technical facts with awe and reverence, giving Nature an inspiring beauty. Eric Chaisson , in his book, Epic of Evolution , concludes that the coherent story of cosmic evolution—a powerful and noble effort—may perhaps be the way to ethical evolution in the new millennium.
Not all of the Epic's advocates are distinguished scientists. Some are Christians who consider it a 'narrative of mythic proportions' that contain religious aspects. They see it as a multifaceted concept that has been in Christian theology implicitly for hundreds of years and is congenial to perspectives that include ultimacy, transcendence, purpose and morality. However, there are both humanists and creationists who dispute this stance, making unclear the many varied theological stories of our world.
In the Institute on Religion in an Age of Science held a conference on the epic of evolution.
It consisted of a small invitational gathering of scholars of the world's religious traditions as well as a number of scientists and educators. It explored how the creation stories of the world's religions intersect with or react to the epic of evolution. It was attended by scientists, artists, educators, and spiritual and religious leaders. Washington University in St. Louis offers a course on the epic of evolution.
The course was presented in three segments: An annual undergraduate course on "cosmic evolution" has been taught at Harvard University for most of the past 35 years. Evolution Sunday , a Christian church event 1, Congregations observed it in  arose from the Clergy Letter Project signed in by 10, American clergy. It is spreading internationally and across other faiths. It supports the story of evolution in a manner similar to the Epic science and religion compatibility promoting serious discussion and reflection on the relationship between religion and science.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. According to Taylor's Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature , an "epic of evolution" encompasses the 14 billion year narrative of cosmic, planetary, life, and cultural evolution—told in sacred ways. Wilson , , p Clearly, people are interested. Of course, there is opposition. Dan Arel, writing for the Richard Dawkins Foundation, protests that "scientists should not debate creationists.
But not everybody is opposed to such debates or pessimistic about the future of the relationship of these two influential aspects of our organized life. Many, including members of the Baha'i Faith, look forward to a future when science and religion -- and faith and reason -- are reconciled and no longer opposed.
The Baha"i Faith holds the unity of science and religion as a core teaching and emphasizes that religion must be in accord with science. God has endowed man with intelligence and reason whereby he is required to determine the verity of questions and propositions. If religious beliefs and opinions are found contrary to the standards of science, they are mere superstitions and imaginations; for the antithesis of knowledge is ignorance, and the child of ignorance is superstition. What then does the Baha'i Faith say about evolution and creation? According to the Baha'i teachings, God is "the Maker, the Creator".
Nature and all created things are the embodiment of God's will:. Nature in its essence is the embodiment of My Name, the Maker, the Creator Nature is God's Will and is its expression in and through the contingent world.
Epic of evolution - Wikipedia
It is endowed with a power whose reality men of learning fail to grasp. Indeed a man of insight can perceive naught therein save the effulgent splendour of Our Name, the Creator.
- Customers who viewed this item also viewed.
- Learning Points: 100 Activities and Actions for Customer Service Excellence.
- BBC Learning English - 6 Minute English / How romance ruined love.
- A Baha'i Take on the Creation/Evolution Debate.
- Star Trek Online: Youre In The Game.
The terms "man" and "human" are used interchangeably below in their non-gender specific sense. Similarly, the terrestrial globe from the beginning was created with all its elements, substances, minerals, atoms and organisms; but these only appeared by degrees: But from the first these kinds and species existed, but were undeveloped in the terrestrial globe, and then appeared only gradually.
But man is endowed with a second reality, the rational or intellectual reality; and the intellectual reality of man predominates over nature. Yet there is a third reality in man, the spiritual reality. In this process, there is no departure from the evolutionary sciences for a more detailed description, see C. At the same time, the Baha'i writings describe humanity as God's creation, say that humans have always existed potentially, and characterize human reality as distinct and different than animal reality.
Epic of evolution
Here there is indeed a departure from some well-known points of view, but it is not a departure from the facts and details of evolutionary science. Rather, the departure is from certain of the perspectives and interpretations -- what are perhaps best called the evolutionary narratives -- that have developed around the evolutionary sciences.
And this Baha'i perspective is not widely different from that of "evolutionary creation" as espoused by such Christian organizations as Biologos started by Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institute of Health, arguably the world's leading biologist , by scholarly Catholicism, or indeed, by a wide cross-section of informed religious belief throughout the world.
Why then is there so much fuss, thunder, and lighting over scientific issues like evolution that are readily reconciled with religious belief -- and have been widely perceived as such for centuries, indeed millennia? Part of the reason must certainly lie in the conflict over evolutionary science that will occupy Bill Nye and Ken Ham in their Feb. The impression such conflict creates -- the unfortunate resistance to well-established science that creationism inculcates -- certainly strengthens any predilections among those of a scientific persuasion to view religion as a kind of primitive pre-science that got its answers wrong.
Undoubtedly there is much more to it than that. Much of creationism is clearly a response to denunciations of religion in the name of science, as well as a reaction against populist movements like social Darwinism that proclaimed their supposed truths as facts derived from the evolutionary sciences. And the conflict is darn good drama, marvelous for motivating the troops, or the congregation, or the donors, and for grabbing headlines and commentary. But ultimately, it is a conflict that should just be peacefully resolved.
Men and women of goodwill should work together to lay the issue to rest where it belong -- along with other dead or dying 19th-century ideological battles. It is just diversion and a side-show to our main task, which is to work together towards that necessary and long-hoped for goal of peace and prosperity for all the countries and peoples of the world, regardless of their beliefs -- or lack thereof.
Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you.