Learn more - opens in a new window or tab.
May not post to Russian Federation - Read item description or contact seller for postage options. This amount is subject to change until you make payment. For additional information, see the Global Shipping Programme terms and conditions - opens in a new window or tab This amount includes applicable customs duties, taxes, brokerage and other fees.
For additional information, see the Global Shipping Programme terms and conditions - opens in a new window or tab. Processed by PayPal Get more time to pay. International postage paid to Pitney Bowes Inc. Learn More - opens in a new window or tab International postage and import charges paid to Pitney Bowes Inc. Learn More - opens in a new window or tab Any international postage and import charges are paid in part to Pitney Bowes Inc. Learn More - opens in a new window or tab Any international postage is paid in part to Pitney Bowes Inc.
Learn More - opens in a new window or tab. Report item - opens in a new window or tab. Description Postage and payments. Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing. A book that has been read, but is in good condition. Minimal damage to the book cover eg. If this is a hard cover, the dust jacket may be missing. Binding has minimal wear. The majority of pages are undamaged with some creasing or tearing, and pencil underlining of text, but this is minimal.
No highlighting of text, no writing in the margins, and no missing pages. See all condition definitions - opens in a new window or tab Read more about the condition. Take a look at our Returning an item help page for more details. You're covered by the eBay Money Back Guarantee if you receive an item that is not as described in the listing. Most purchases from business sellers are protected by the Consumer Contract Regulations which give you the right to cancel the purchase within 14 days after the day you receive the item.
Find out more about your rights as a buyer - opens in a new window or tab and exceptions - opens in a new window or tab. The seller hasn't specified a postage method to Russian Federation. Contact the seller - opens in a new window or tab and request post to your location.
Postage cost can't be calculated. Please enter a valid postcode. There are 1 items available. In some ways, the text reminded me of Cowley's What If series slightly overdone by volume II, but a treasure nonetheless Stand out "must read" essays: Robert Remini's "The Corrupt Bargain" 2.
I Wish I'd Been There: Twenty Historians Bring to Life Dramatic Events That Changed America
Paul Nagel's "The Amistad Trial" 3. Mark Stevens' "Chief Joseph Surrenders" 6. Kevin Baker's "Lost-Found Nation: The self-righteous, anti-war "it's all Bush's fault" tone of Cowley and cow-towing progressivism of Ward and others was lamentable. While I love a well placed historical parallel, those presented here were juvenile and overdone. Feb 14, Monicaaa rated it liked it Shelves: This book is a compilation of essays written by historians about the events they wished they could have witnessed in American history.
They range anywhere from before the discovery of the New World to the Civil Rights Movement in the s. I really liked the concept of the book: Some historians described the events as best they could. Others decided to give a hypothesis of what they think occurred. The way each essay went ab This book is a compilation of essays written by historians about the events they wished they could have witnessed in American history.
The way each essay went about answering the question was rather interesting.
このページにアクセスすることができません - エキサイト
It made me wonder where I would want to travel back to, what I would want to see. There were essays I loved, essays I found were okay and essays I had trouble getting through in this anthology. I wouldn't recommend doing what I did and reading straight through. Instead, I'd recommend taking a look at the table of contents, picking a topic you like, and reading that essay.
If you read straight through, you will find an essay you absolutely can't stand.
See a Problem?
But as a history major myself, I can't say anything bad about any of them. Sure there's areas of history I gloss over. Yet others find those areas amazing. Likewise, they probably gloss over what I would find interesting. Jun 23, Michael rated it liked it. The concept of this book is a great one, the execution was hit and miss. Brown is one of the most controversial people in US History and it would have great to have really seen what he was all about. Thomas Fleming thinks he was a nut who happened to believe in a good cause.
The chapter on GW rejecting becoming a US king was good. One of my favorites was on a meeting that LBJ had with George Wallace at the White House during the desegre The concept of this book is a great one, the execution was hit and miss. It would have been awesome to see Johnson give the little shit the treatment.
Other chapters were far less interesting than these three. I found out that the Amistad Trial was much less moving than the movie and this was a bit depressing, I didn't care about James Polk and the election of , and I pretty much already new what Jonathan Rabb had to say about the Scopes trial. Not worth full price.
Aug 25, Maura rated it liked it Shelves: I picked this up from my library one summer while earning my history degree and was feeling my history major. I liked the concept - that these historians would write themselves into a historic period or event and essentially through their narrative bring the scene to life. It didn't fully manage its goal. Perhaps if each historian had written a fiction story within the historically accurate depiction, I might have been a bit more interested. But each one was an essay, rich in detail and descript I picked this up from my library one summer while earning my history degree and was feeling my history major.
But each one was an essay, rich in detail and description but only really interesting if one found that period of history truly interesting. I think that was one of my other issues with the book - I didn't care for all of periods that were chosen. I generally dislike most of the s Still, it is an intriguing idea and I would probably enjoy some that were set in ancient times a bit more Jul 22, David rated it it was ok. Gosh, the email back-and-forth I had with family and friends over the places that we'd have like to have been was more fun.
Don't get me wrong, some of the chapters were especially good. But every chapter was written by somebody different, so a few were real nose-pickers. You can pick a 24 hour period to be some place and you're picking a 1, years ago to watch the natives dance to the gods? And some of the chapters were simply must-haves for the P. We allow you to go back in time and Gosh, the email back-and-forth I had with family and friends over the places that we'd have like to have been was more fun.
We allow you to go back in time and you choose the last known meeting between Elijah Muhammad and W. Don't give me P. The last half of the book was better than the first, but this book sold me on the title, not on what I got. Jun 30, Andrew rated it did not like it Shelves: I found it pretty underwhelming and each chapter seemed slightly rushed. Some were better than others, like the section on the Newbergh Conspiracy and George Washington's efforts to negotiate a treaty with the Creeks.
Robert Remini was his dry, too-pro Andrew Jackson self, and one of the writers tried to make too much out of the Amistad case of Pennsylvania decided the following year, I take issue with anyone who argues that the Amistad case was the most important slavery cas I found it pretty underwhelming and each chapter seemed slightly rushed.
Pennsylvania decided the following year, I take issue with anyone who argues that the Amistad case was the most important slavery case the Supreme Court decided before Dred Scott. I ended up skimming a lot of the rest and found little that hasn't been written about already. Apr 20, Chloe rated it liked it Shelves: It was a smart decision on the editor's part to put the most interesting, engaging story as the first.
This really got me excited for the rest of the book. The rest is like a essay, and most of them I've already forgotten. I don't want to sound stupid, but jeez, there are some big words and bigger descriptions on here. It was very hard to follow sometimes. But, some of these even It was a smart decision on the editor's part to put the most interesting, engaging story as the first. But, some of these events I had not learned about before, and so I have a basic knowledge about them.
- Site not found · GitHub Pages.
- How to teach english in Japan.
- Navigation menu?
- Shop by category.
- Semantics: Primes and Universals (St. in Classification Data Analysis).
Twenty historians recount pivotal moments in US history. I think the key to liking this collection is to skip over essays that don't pique your attention. For me, there were a half dozen of those, and it was obvious within a few paragraphs when a topic wasn't interesting. Favorites of the remaining essays include: Jul 09, Jess Colopy rated it it was ok.
Such a hit and miss, as so many other reviews have said. A few of the essays sparked by interest, but most put me to sleep. The format of the first essay made it interesting and gave me false hope about the rest of the novel. The Salem Witchcraft Trials essay was the biggest let down, in my opinion. It consisted of the historian asking questions that she never answered and promoting her own book.
You're better off reading the Wikipedia pages about the events. Aug 01, Jen rated it liked it. The premise of this book is fascinating -- ask 20 historians what moment in history they would like to have witnessed first hand -- but the result was uneven. Not all of their choices were events I found interesting inevitable, I guess and the writing was uneven also inevitable, I guess.
Still, I'd like to read the European history sequel. Sep 11, Tamara rated it really liked it Shelves: Not all of them are "big" moments stressed in history books.
Some of them are good, some of them are less interesting. And if you don't care about history, you probably won't like any of them. Sep 08, Jamie rated it liked it. This was an interesting book, and I will admit I skipped some of the stories because I just don't enjoy reading about political things so much. Most of the historians writing about the events they would've liked to witness didn't go into a great deal of detail about their particular event, but I guess that makes it a "teaser" in a way to learn more about certain historical events.
Aug 11, Aaron rated it liked it.